A preprint study on the hyperlink between scholarly efficiency and compensation finds that cumulative analysis productiveness was extra strongly associated to compensation for males versus girls—however solely in STEM fields, not within the social and behavioral sciences. In STEM, girls with the comparatively excessive h-index productiveness and quotation measure of 49 have been paid $6,000 lower than their male counterparts at that degree, for instance. The authors, who studied 3,033 researchers from 17 research-intensive universities, suggest that establishments replace their compensation formulation and carry out routine pay-equity analyses.
Co-author Christiane Spitzmüller, vice provost for educational affairs and technique on the College of California, Merced, told Science that current analysis means that the h-index metric favors males in some ways, and that her personal research subsequently in all probability underestimates gendered variations in pay. “You in all probability have an excellent starker impact for girls who … do extra on dimensions that aren’t rewarded with a excessive h-index,” similar to mentoring and different service work, she stated.